NAUI Members'
Forum #10 - Open Water Dive Minimums
NDA News,
Mar/Apr
1989, pp.10-14
|
QUESTION:
"What is the minimum number of dives required to produce
a competent openwater diver for your particular location or
environment? For an advanced diver? Why?"
|
Compiled and
edited by Jeffrey Bozanic
A diver's
ability in the water is of paramount importance to his or her safety.
Development of skills which comprise that ability is often considered
to be directly proportional to the amount of open water diving experience
the diver has. Often, adverse or "advanced" environments
may require additional dives produce an "equal" level
of competence in divers that otherwise would perform identically
so far as skills are concerned.
This month's
Forum question was posed to explore how geographic variances impact
the concept of "competent" entry level and advanced divers.
Interestingly, a broad geographic or environmentally based consensus
of the number of dives required to achieve any given level was not
found. For most levels, a majority of the instructors submitting responses
generally agreed on the minimum number of dives required regardless
of geographic differences and constraints.
Most instructors
felt that six dives would be optimal for entry level or Openwater
I certification. The range varied from as few as two dives to a maximum
of twelve dives.
For
Openwater II a total of 12 dives was nearly universally seen as appropriate.
The number of instructors voicing opinions on this course was very
small, however.
Considering
the Advanced course, many interesting suggestions were made. Several
instructors independently advanced the idea that a prerequisite for
entering the course be mandated. This prerequisite would require the
diver to have completed a defined minimum number of dives without
instructor or divemaster supervision to ensure that they have the
self confidence and skills to dive safely on their own. Ten to fifty
dives were proposed as satisfactory to meet this prerequisite.
With this recommendation
factored in, the number of dives necessary to produce an "advanced"
diver extended from a minimum of ten total dives to a maximum of 75
total dives. The average figure of thirty dives includes the dives
conducted as part of previous training courses. This means that after
Openwater II certification, an additional 18 dives was considered
appropriate to achieve advanced skills.
Some instructors
felt that a minimum number of dives was an artificial and poor manner
of classifying skill ratings of divers. They believe that all levels
of training should be competency based as opposed to quantifying numbers
of dives made.
Finally, the
concept of the "student diver" or use of the Openwater I
certification card as a "learner's permit" was submitted.
This visualization was not fully explored by the responders, but could
potentially have several benefits for NAUI and the diving community.
This idea will be examined in greater detail in a future issue of
NDA News.
QUESTION: "WHAT
IS THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF DIVES REQUIRED TO PRODUCE A COMPETENT OPENWATER
DIVER FOR YOUR PARTICULAR LOCATION OR ENVIRONMENT? FOR AN ADVANCED
DIVER? WHY?
A. This
parameter cannot be defined concretely as a specific number, but will
vary from diver to diver. The evaluation for entry level certification
should be competency based, and not based on the number of dives completed.
This is also true for the advanced diver level. Keeping this in mind,
I believe for the average diver that 12 dives would be minimal for
entry level certification, and 50-75 dives be required for advanced
diver training.
--Ken Ascher,NAUI 9200L; Ann Arbor, MI(CEO of Ocean Technology Group.
Teaches primarily entry level students at the University of Michigan.)
A. For Openwater
I six dives should be required. Beyond that number would be boring
for students. With more dives you would need to expose them to new
skills and activities that more properly belong in a more advanced
class.
For Advanced Diver nine scuba training dives beyond Openwater I with
an additional 15 logged dives should be required. The first training
dive would be a checkout/skills review, with the other eight dives
exposing the student to different diving activities and/or exercises.
Thus the total number of dives required to be certified at Advanced
level would be 30.
Ronnie Damico, NAUI 5489; Long Beach, CA(Diving Officer for the California
State University in Long Beach, current South Pacific Branch Manager;
has taught all levels of courses to ITCs; recipient of NAUI Outstanding
Service Award; NAUI ICUE Conference Chairman.)
A. Three to
four dives here on Grand Cayman should be sufficient to produce an
entry level diver. Doing more dives would produce a "safer"
diver if basic skills are practiced on each dive. If not, then extra
dives do not necessarily increase skill level or improve diver competency.
--Ron Campbell, NAUI 10840; Grand Cayman, British West Indies (Assistant
Operations Manager, Don Foster's Dive. Teaches primarily Introductory
Courses and referral students in a resort environment.)
A. In order
to prevent the inevitable brawl, and not terrify the peddlers of scuba
gear, we need to introduce the concept of the "student diver"
before we try to quantify competence. Diving in the North Atlantic
is amongst the most diverse and demanding--if you can dive here, you
can dive anywhere. Just being properly ballasted takes several dives,
which is far more than the average hurry-up hot-shot shop instructor
wants to invest. So, I will leave the business of establishing a minimum
number of dives to a convention of North Atlantic NAUI instructors
called for that purpose. And I urge the introduction of the "student
diver" as soon as possible.
--Fred Calhoun, NAUI 380; Boston, MA(Private Professional Instructor,
has taught all levels of diving to ITCs. Producer of the Boston Diving
Show. Past North Atlantic Branch Manager. Recipient of NAUI Outstanding
Service Award.)
A. The question
is not the number of dives made, but rather the experience gained
and retained during the dives. In 25 years of teaching diving, I have
observed divers who apparently get a tremendous experience credit
from a 45 minute dive. They seem to be aware of the environment and
what is required to adjust to the demands of the diving environment.
These individuals are better adjusted and demonstrate more competency
than the majority of students do after the currently required five
(rapidly approaching infinity) hand held dives. Perhaps we should
learn something from flight training, where the student learns more
about flying the plane when the instructor steps out.
In my opinion we should not penalize the water oriented person with
the number of dives which are now considered mandatory for a person
who probably needs constant diving instruction and monitoring for
life! I believe that the number of dives should be dictated by the
aptitude of the student, with a minimum of two dives.
Another thought--each open water instructional dive increases the
instructor's liability 100%, takes up every weekend of their life,
involves instructors freezing their collective butts off, and pays
them nothing. Is anyone thinking about the instructors any longer??
--Spence Campbell, NAUI A-20; Renton, WA(Private professional instructor
and diving consultant, past NAUI Board of Directors candidate and
Chapter Leader, past General Manager of the Ocean Corporation.)
A. For my area,
six scuba dives are needed. With each dive, students can see their
air consumption going down, and their entire attitude in the water
and degree of comfort improve. At the end of six dives they are relaxed.
For advanced level, another 15 dives are required, for a total of
21 dives.
For both levels, students dive both rivers and lakes. I think this
is necessary, even if the students believe they will only be diving
in the ocean. I feel this way because it has been my observation that
they do not know at this early point in their diving career what type
of diving they will be doing locally after they are certified.
--Linda Dean, NAUI 6015; Richardson, TX(Private professional instructor
and dive trip leader.)
A. Entry level
should require six dives. The term "Advanced diver" should
be reconsidered, as it creates the perception that divers are capable
of "exotic" dives rather than the expansion of normal diving
capabilities for which students are actually trained. Openwater II
should be six additional dives (12 total dives), and "Advanced
Diver" should have a total of 24 dives.
Richard Fernandez, NAUI 6741L; Miami Shores, FL (Instructor at Barry
University, teaches primarily entry level courses and as staff at
ITCs. Member, NAUI Board of Directors.)
A. I support
what NAUI did by going to a minimum of five dives. A person who has
this experience is ready to learn--and capable of handling most of
the problems encountered. Through continued diving, they will reach
a point at which they are comfortable. Depending on the ability of
the individual, the minimum number of dives will vary. Some will never
become competent divers, regardless of increased experience.
Phil French, NAUI 7609; Long Beach, CA(Teaches in dive stores and
as a private professional primarily Openwater I, II, and Hunting and
Collecting Specialty courses.)
A. In 1972
our training facility in the Virgin Islands required five open water
ocean dives for Basic certification. In 1988 most national agencies
require at least that for "open water" certifications but
in many cases this process is circumvented with confined lake, quarry,
or other sites. Indeed, those of us on the receiving end of newly
graduated students can all tell stories of certified divers that have
never been in salt water. This is not to say that these persons should
not be allowed to dive; rather that a need be recognized that anything
less than ocean diving is really not adequate to train most divers
for the environment in which they will undoubtedly wish to participate.
Further, we now find divers with very limited experience holding all
sorts of certification credentials that even classify them as "master
divers." Come on...somewhere the system lost track of its end
purpose: giving us a common language rating divers' training and experience
levels. The same holds true for "Master Instructors" who
may have been teaching for less than a year. I may be overstating
the problem, but I long for the days when you were either a certified
diver, advanced diver, or instructor. Specialty certifications serve
valuable training ends, but I wonder if we have become obsessed with
reams of diplomas to the sacrifice of a solid basic training program.
In warm, clear water conditions I certainly think a diver can be adequately
trained in 5 -6 dives to be reasonably self-sufficient to then go
on and learn more practical lessons through experience. Since the
c-card initially is really just a "learner's permit" anyway,
let's call it that and not try to rate our new divers any higher than
they should be. Regional considerations such as cold or dark water,
currents, surf conditions, etc. should logically dictate further training
and the opportunity for neophytes to err while still under the protective
and guiding eye of his instructor.
Teaching divers to dive within their limitations should be paramount,
and we need more sensitive instructors with good communication skills
to assure that the student's anxieties are identified early in training
and handled as a positive portion of the learning experience.
I would like to see the national standard raised to include eight
ocean dives minimum, with more training proscribed where dictated
by regional environmental conditions. The argument will be brought
forth that this is too high a standard to be economically productive,
but considering the drop-out rate of newly certified divers wouldn't
it be better to exert more control over the entry level participants
so that they are fully confident in their skills and remain in the
sport? That is economically sound and it is safer. What an interesting
marriage!
--Bret Gilliam, NAUI 3234; New Orleans, LA(Director of Diving Operations
for Ocean Quest International. Owner for 17 years of dive operation
in Virgin Islands. Expert witness in diving accidents. Has taught
all levels including ITC staff experience.)
A. The minimum
number of open water dives should remain at least five, but as class
numbers increase the length of the class, especially the pool sessions,
should be increased. This will insure that there is enough individual
attention is provided to each student. We might consider setting up
a ratio system where as class size becomes larger, more pool and open
water sessions are added. More open water dives could also reflect
the types of dives that the local environment provides, as well as
proper boat and shore dives.
I find it unfortunate that so many divers travel to the ocean lacking
the proper experience or exposure, thus making their initial experience
in real open water a complete turn off. Besides opening up the possibility
of potential accidents, that is how diver drop outs are formed. More
experience would alleviate that occurrence.
--Mike Gomez, NAUI 9244; Panama City Beach, FL (Co-Owner of Panama
City Dive Center, a NAUI PRO Facility. Teaches primarily Openwater
I and private classes, some ITC staff experience.)
A. For an openwater
diver in Tennessee 6-8 dives (two weekends of diving) are needed.
We have silt that runs from two inches to three feet thick which limits
visibility, cold water, and crumbly ledges that necessitates additional
technique training and in-water experience. After only one weekend's
dives, the students still do not enjoy diving. After the second, they
are relaxed enough to have a good time. Advanced divers should have
a minimum of two more complete weekends of diving, for a total of
16-20 dives.
Harold McIlwain, NAUI 8751; Nashville, TN (Owner of Diving Adventures,
a NAUI PRO Facility. Has taught levels from Introductory to Advanced,
including Specialty Courses.)
A. The five
dives we presently deal with are generally acceptable within our environmental
constraints, but there should be an additional sixth dive which would
be a mandatory free dive. I believe that it should be mandatory that
the dives be spread over a minimum of two weekends.
Rather than beef up or alter numbers for the Advanced certification,
we should strengthen the Openwater II course requirements. An additional
two dives should be required, for a total of eight dives in this course.
Four hours of specific lecture should also be added.
The Advanced course should remain at eight dives, but should be made
mandatory for advancement into diving leadership courses. Additional
logged dives other than training dives should be required to enter
the Advanced program.
Scott Munro, NAUI 6791L; Bellevue, WA (Former North Pacific Branch
Manager; has taught all levels from Openwater I to ITCs. Operates
a video production company. Recipient of NAUI Outstanding Service
Award.)
A. The number
of dives for an Openwater I diver should not be changed. As a manager
of a diving company in the Caribbean four scuba dives work for our
schedule. I feel that students perceive a quality training program
from their instructors in the States complemented by personal training
in open water with the Caribbean instructor.
Openwater II should require a minimum of 8-10 scuba dives. The dives
should include the use of different computers that are now on the
market; as well as night, boat, search and recovery, navigation, deep,
and wreck dives. The last two dives should relate to the kind of diving
conditions found in the area where the course is taught.
NAUI's Advanced course should mandate in the prerequisites a minimum
of 10 logged non-training dives. Sometimes students get so caught
up in taking courses that they do not dive just for the fun and love
of diving, or all their dives are supervised and they learn only to
rely on an instructor for the final approval of their dive plan. As
for the course a minimum of 15 dives should be required. People with
an advanced card should have a wide range of diving experiences. They
should at this point be very confident in their diving abilities.
--Chris Lexau, NAUI 6618; Grand Cayman Island, British West Indies
(Manager of Operations and Training for Bob Soto's Dive. Taught all
openwater levels to ITC staff experience.)
A. A minimum
of 4-5 scuba dives are necessary here. In our conditions (60-80 feet
deep drift dives in the Gulf Stream) divers need to be better prepared
than most students. Buoyancy control is especially important. Our
students get lots of practice in our 16 feet deep pool before the
open water dives. Our divers must have experience to 80 feet in order
to be competent. We also believe that reinforcement immediately after
the course is over is important, so we let students use rental gear
free for a month after the class is completed.
Ten to 15 dives here are generally enough to produce a competent advanced
diver.
Norine Rouse, NAUI 1040; West Palm Beach, FL (Director of the Norine
Rouse Scuba Club, a NAUI Pro Facility. Has taught all levels of diving.
Recipient of the John Stoneman Environmental Award for her work with
sea turtles, and Diver of the Year for Underwater Boston.)
A. First of
all, the word competent should be changed to confident. In general,
the minimum required dives for the open water diver courses isn't
enough for most (not all) students, be they warm water or cold water
divers. Any number greater than the required minimum is better as
long as the student gets positive results from it. Of course, one
must be careful of burning out the students. So, filling the dives
with more time with underwater tours will make it all worthwhile for
them. Another valuable solution in attaining confidence is by helping
the student to continuously dive right after certification. Diving
with safe and willing experienced divers in a club, or with a divemaster,
assistant instructor, or instructor would definitely help in achieving
this. Experience in equipment handling and in various local diving
conditions enhances students' confidence levels.
Being confident with the basic skills should be a prerequisite for
the Advanced Diver program. This would enable the diver to better
concentrate and learn the advanced skills safely. Learning to apply
the theoretical skills safely and successfully underwater is a good
measure of achieving confidence. Again any number of dives higher
than the minimum is better. This allows the student more chances to
correct his errors under the valuable guidance of the instructor.
--Carlos
N. Santos-Viola, NAUI 5687L; San Francisco, CA (Former Training Director
and General Manager of Aquaventure Phils, Inc. Has taught all levels
to ITCs. Former Safety Chairman for the Amphibians Scuba Club.)
A. There is
no true answer to this question. Due to human nature and personal
judgment we must first define several parameters. What is competent?
No number of dives can result in competence, it is quality in the
completion of tasks.
What is deemed to be adequate by one instructor is not the same for
another instructor, even in the same location or environment. All
over the world different organizations impose different levels that
assist their people to produce some level of safety. With such a diverse
planet, the type of diving encountered, and the equipment required
by the diver also factor into the question of competence.
A number of dives may be set to provide a minimum exposure for our
students, but it only a minimum. The limits an instructor requires
are a different matter, and we must allow him to apply his personal
judgment. Setting a mere number of dives can not determine competence
of a basic diver, advanced diver, or for an instructor, as "competence"
is a subjective subject.
--D.P.
Miles, NAUI 4687; Trenton, Ontario, Canada
[NOTE: The views expressed in this column are opinions held by
the individual members referenced, and are not those of NAUI or the
editors of NDA News.]