If you had asked cave divers during that time frame what they thought of their activity, most would have said, “If you have the proper training and equipment, cave diving is relatively safe,” or “An accident could never happen to me… I’m a trained cave diver!” This was based in large part on the subjective, non-quantitative analysis of the fatality statistics. Efforts to temper this attitude of “immortality” were generally ineffective.

However, beginning in the late 1980s, and continuing to today, the involvement of trained cave divers in fatal incidents has increased. [Figure 2] A casual look at the trends shows that while the percentage of fatalities involving trained cave divers has become increasing erratic, but it does not appear to be overly alarming. But a review of the data posted as a cumulative percentage of trained cave divers involved in fatal incidents shows a steady, significant increase in involvement of this population.

Figure 2: Involvement of Trained Cave(rn) Divers in Fatal Incidents from the Years 1973 to 2004. The upper line represents the percentage of trained cave(rn) divers involved in incidents for that individual year, the lower line shows the cumulative percentage of involvement.

Further analysis shows that the average percentage of trained cave(rn) divers involved in fatal incidents was about 5% for the years 1973-1987. However, for the years 1988-2004 this average has climbed to nearly 30%! Why has this occurred? Presented in no particular order, I believe there are several reasons:

1. The cave diving community had taken a very proactive stance in promoting training for this specialized form of diving. Development of training courses and materials, the warning sign projects, promulgation of standards to the open water diving certification agencies, and myriads of safety presentations to dive clubs and other groups have combined to form an extremely effective outreach program. Many of those divers who would otherwise have gone cavern or cave diving without proper training now seek out such training prior to participating in such diving. The more divers who get trained in cave(rn) diving, the likelier the possibility that a trained individual will perish in a cave diving incident. Limiting access to some dive sites to only trained cave divers has further strengthened this trend.

2. Cave diving is a very expensive pastime. This limits participation to two basic groups, the diving “zealots” who spend every penny they make on diving, and those with sufficient disposable income to participate without undue financial stress. This latter group has grown significantly as the number of articles in dive magazines, television programs, dive club and dive show presentations, and even portrayal in national mainstream magazines and movies have fostered an image of “coolness” surrounding the activity. Unfortunately, this population does not generally dive as regularly as the “zealots,” often participating in only a few cave dives once or twice per year while on vacation. This lack of consistent activity and practice leads to skill degradation that probably contributes to fatalities. This may be referred to as the “Weekend Warrior” syndrome.

3. We have an aging population of cave(rn) divers. The diving “zealots” who pioneered this activity in the 1960s and 1970s are now getting older (present company excluded, of course!), and are exhibiting health issues consistent with their age. The newer divers often are older as well, as they are the ones who have the disposable income to participate. Both groups may have diagnosed, or even undiagnosed, health issues such as high blood pressure, coronary artery disease, poor physical conditioning, or other problems that cause or contribute to fatalities.

4. The aforementioned issue involves only two large subpopulation of cave(rn) divers. The third major subgroup are the younger or mid-aged diving “zealots” who are fit and dive regularly. However, this group is not immune to problems. One potential issue is that of complacency. Many of these divers cave dive regularly, sometimes two to three times weekly. With this level of activity, it is my observation, supported somewhat by fatality reports, that they begin to skip safety checks, dive briefings, dive planning, proper line protocols, or proper air rules. While they may get away with this decreased level of attention to detail in the short term, eventually some event may occur that then results in a fatality that otherwise may not have.

5. Finally, the issue of new or developmental technology seems to be playing a part in the number of increased fatalities in trained cave(rn) divers. Use of diver propulsion vehicles (DPVs), stage diving, side mount diving, and rebreathers have all played a part in some fatalities. Again, the population at most implicated in this issue are the younger or mid-aged cave divers who dive on a very regular basis.

This information is not complete. Some incidents yet remain to be entered and analyzed. In addition, I have not as yet looked at long term trends dealing with diving participation, either in terms of number of cave(rn) divers or number of cave(rn) dives made. Yet, the indications are that these trends are real and compelling. I suggest that every cave diver sits back and takes a look at what he/she is doing, and assess how these trends may pertain to you individually. As I complete further analysis on the accident database, you can expect further reports like this in the near future.

1. Bozanic JE and Halpern, RE, 1996, A statistical evaluation of cave diving fatalities," in Taylor, M. (ed),Proceedings of the 24th Annual Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Pacific Chapter Scientific Meeting and Diver Conference, UHMS.

2. Bozanic, JE, 1999, “Compilation of technical diving incident database,” in Stone, T. ed, Proceedings of the 27th Annual Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Pacific Chapter Scientific Meeting and Diver Conference, UHMS, 6 p.

3. -----, 2001, “Cave diving fatalities in 2000,” NACD Journal,Winter 2000/Spring 2001, pp. 23-26.

4. -----, 2001, “Cave diving fatalities in 2000,” Underwater Speleology, (28:2), pp. 6-8.

***While the database contains many incidents prior to 1973, that year was selected as prior to that time standardized training programs were generally unavailable, so the evaluation of those incidents in this context is nonsensical. Further articles on the topic will include data from that time period.***

All content, images and text copright © Jeffrey Bozanic (except as noted). All rights reserved worldwide. No images or text may be copied, duplicated, modified, or redistributed in part of whole (except for printing for personal reference) without prior written consent from Jeffrey Bozanic.